Hospital Credentialing Services for Facilities & Medical Staff
Facility credentialing runs on two tracks at once: the facility has to enroll in Medicare on the application CMS assigns to its entity type -- a hospital on the CMS-855A, an ambulatory surgical center on the CMS-855B -- and keep that enrollment revalidated in PECOS, while the medical staff office credentials and privileges every practitioner under the hospital Conditions of Participation. MedPrecision manages both tracks -- institutional enrollment and revalidation, payer credentialing, and the primary source verification, privileging, and reappointment workflow behind the medical staff bylaws.
- Free audit
- No contract
- HIPAA-secure
- Cancel anytime
What Are Hospital Credentialing Services?
Hospital credentialing services cover the enrollment and credentialing work a facility needs to bill and stay compliant. That includes enrolling the facility in Medicare through PECOS on the application CMS assigns to its entity type -- the CMS-855A (the Medicare Enrollment Application for Institutional Providers, OMB control number 0938-0685) for a hospital, the CMS-855B for an ambulatory surgical center -- paying and tracking the institutional application fee, and completing revalidations, changes of information, and new-location filings; credentialing the facility with commercial, Medicaid/CHIP, and Medicare Advantage payers so it adjudicates in-network; and supporting the medical staff office's credentialing, primary source verification, privileging, and periodic reappraisal of practitioners under 42 CFR 482.22 and the medical staff bylaws. For ambulatory surgical centers the same work runs under 42 CFR Part 416, and where a facility credentials on a health plan's behalf it becomes delegated credentialing governed by NCQA standards.
- CMS-855A enrollment for hospitals and other institutional providers, CMS-855B enrollment for ASCs, and PECOS revalidation for both
- Payer credentialing so the facility is in-network with commercial, Medicaid, and Medicare Advantage plans
- Medical staff office support: primary source verification, privileging, and periodic reappraisal under 42 CFR 482.22
- Delegated-credentialing and CVO workflows aligned to NCQA standards when a facility credentials on a plan's behalf
Hospital credentialing services are not individual provider credentialing scaled up -- they are a distinct discipline that operates at two levels at once. First, the hospital itself has to be enrolled as a Medicare institutional provider on the CMS-855A and kept revalidated through PECOS; second, the hospital's medical staff must be credentialed and privileged under the Medicare Conditions of Participation, where an organized medical staff operates under bylaws approved by the governing body and is responsible for the quality of medical care provided to patients (42 CFR 482.22). MedPrecision's hospital and facility credentialing team works across acute-care hospitals, critical access hospitals, ambulatory surgical centers, and other institutional providers -- handling Medicare institutional enrollment on whichever application the entity type actually requires and its recurring revalidations. CMS lists hospitals and hospital units, critical access hospitals, skilled nursing facilities, home health agencies, hospices, FQHCs, RHCs and rural emergency hospitals on the CMS-855A, and ambulatory surgical centers on the CMS-855B alongside clinics, group practices, hospital departments and IDTFs -- so an ASC does not file an 855A. The team also handles the payer credentialing that gets the facility in-network, and the primary source verification, privileging, and periodic reappraisal workflow the medical staff office runs to satisfy the governing body and the accreditor. Because credentialing at the facility level is one of the functions health plans most commonly delegate, it can also carry delegated-credentialing and CVO obligations that individual provider files never touch.
Who This Service Is For
The State of Hospital & Facility Credentialing Services in 2026
Facility credentialing sits inside a regulatory frame built for institutions, not individuals. Under 42 CFR 424.502, an 'institutional provider' is any provider or supplier that files a CMS-855A (or a CMS-855B or CMS-855S), and unlike an individual physician filing a CMS-855I, an institutional provider must pay the Medicare application fee -- set at $750 for calendar year 2026, up from $730 in 2025 by the CPI-U adjustment. CMS estimates roughly 33,863 institutional providers will revalidate and pay that fee in CY 2026, part of about 46,381 total including newly enrolling facilities, which signals the sheer recurring volume of institutional enrollment work. On the clinical side, the hospital Conditions of Participation make an organized medical staff, operating under governing-body-approved bylaws, responsible for the quality of care (42 CFR 482.22); the governing body may appoint members of the medical staff only after considering the medical staff's recommendations (42 CFR 482.12(a)(2)), selection turns on individual character, competence, training, experience, and judgment (42 CFR 482.12(a)(6)), and staff membership or privileges cannot depend solely on board certification, fellowship, or society membership (42 CFR 482.12(a)(7)). Facilities can meet these CoPs through a CMS-approved accreditor -- for hospitals, such as The Joint Commission or DNV Healthcare -- instead of a state survey under Section 1865(a) of the Social Security Act, and for delegated credentialing, NCQA's Credentialing Accreditation eligibility rules bar an organization that delegates more than 50% of credentialing decision-making.
What Is Breaking Right Now
Facility Part A billing privileges lapsing because a CMS-855A revalidation deadline was missed in PECOS
Claims paying out-of-network because the facility was never credentialed with a commercial or Medicare Advantage plan
Privileging decisions that cannot be supported at survey because the file does not map to the medical staff bylaws criteria (42 CFR 482.22(c)(6))
Reappointment backlogs where expired licenses, DEA, or board status slip past the periodic reappraisal the CoPs require
Delegated-credentialing files that fail a health plan's audit because primary source verification or decision-making was not documented to the delegation agreement
Common Hospital & Facility Credentialing Services Mistakes to Avoid
Treating facility enrollment as a one-time filing
Revalidation, change-of-information, and new-location deadlines slip in PECOS, and CMS holds payment or deactivates the facility's billing privileges under 42 CFR 424.540 -- the enrollment record survives and can be reactivated, but nothing furnished while deactivated is paid, and reactivation runs only from the date the contractor receives the submission it approves. That is a different and lesser action than revocation under 42 CFR 424.535, which terminates the enrollment and any provider agreement and carries a re-enrollment bar.
Track revalidation and expirable dates centrally, file changes and new-location applications proactively, and budget the institutional application fee that recurs with each qualifying submission.
Filing the wrong CMS-855 for the entity
The facility, group, or individual is enrolled on the wrong application and it is rejected or delayed -- the CMS-855A is for hospitals and the other institutional provider types CMS lists on it, the CMS-855B for clinics, group practices and certain other suppliers -- ambulatory surgical centers among them -- and the CMS-855I for individual physicians and non-physician practitioners.
Match the form to the entity type at intake and file each through PECOS, so an institutional enrollment is never routed onto a group or individual application.
Privileging without mapping to the bylaws criteria
Privileges are granted but cannot be defended at survey because there is no documented procedure applying the medical staff bylaws criteria to the individual applicant, as 42 CFR 482.22(c)(6) requires.
Build each privileging decision against the bylaws criteria and retain the file the governing body acted on, so the grant is traceable to the criteria and the recommendation.
Granting membership solely on board certification
42 CFR 482.12(a)(7) prohibits staff membership or privileges from depending solely on certification, fellowship, or membership in a specialty body -- files built that way invite a deficiency.
Document the full selection criteria the governing body must ensure -- character, competence, training, experience, and judgment (42 CFR 482.12(a)(6)) -- rather than treating certification as the whole basis.
What We Handle
Facility (Institutional) Medicare Enrollment
We enroll hospitals, critical access hospitals, SNFs and other CMS-855A provider types on the Medicare Enrollment Application for Institutional Providers (OMB 0938-0685), and ambulatory surgical centers on the CMS-855B, and file each through PECOS. Unlike an individual physician filing a CMS-855I, an institutional provider must pay the Medicare application fee (42 CFR 424.502), and we handle that payment as part of the filing.
Revalidation & Enrollment Maintenance
CMS enrollment is not one-and-done. We track and file revalidations, changes of information, new practice locations, and voluntary terminations on the facility's enrollment record, ahead of the deadlines that put billing privileges into deactivation. CMS estimates tens of thousands of institutional providers revalidate each year, each paying the application fee again.
Payer Credentialing & Network Enrollment
Beyond Medicare, we credential and enroll the facility with commercial plans, Medicaid and CHIP, and Medicare Advantage payers so claims adjudicate in-network. CMS separates enrollment by entity type -- the CMS-855A for hospitals and the other institutional providers listed on it, the CMS-855B for clinics, group practices and certain other suppliers including ambulatory surgical centers, and the CMS-855I for individual physicians and non-physician practitioners -- and we file the right application for the right entity.
Medical Staff Credentialing & Privileging
We support the medical staff office's credentialing and privileging workflow: gathering applications, running primary source verification, and mapping requested clinical privileges against the criteria in the medical staff bylaws, which must include criteria for the privileges granted and a procedure for applying those criteria to each applicant (42 CFR 482.22(c)(6)).
Reappointment & Reappraisal Cycles
The medical staff must periodically conduct appraisals of its members (42 CFR 482.22(a)(1)), so credentialing is a recurring cycle, not a one-time gate. We manage reappointment queues, expirables (licenses, DEA, board status, malpractice), and the documentation the governing body needs to act on medical staff recommendations before appointing members (42 CFR 482.12(a)(2)).
Delegated Credentialing & CVO Workflow
Where a hospital or health system credentials on a health plan's behalf, credentialing becomes a delegated function -- one an NCQA article notes is among the most commonly delegated. The plan retains accountability, so the delegate's files, primary source verification, and decision-making have to hold up to audit. We build and run that CVO-style workflow to the plan's delegation agreement.
Accreditation-Readiness Support
Facilities can demonstrate compliance with the Medicare Conditions of Participation through a CMS-approved accrediting organization instead of a state survey ('deemed status') under Section 1865(a) of the Social Security Act -- for hospitals, accreditors such as The Joint Commission or DNV Healthcare, whose standards must meet or exceed Medicare's. We help align credentialing files, bylaws criteria, and privileging records to what those surveys examine.
Free Billing Audit · No obligation
Map Your Facility's Credentialing Gaps
Tell us your entity type, your current Medicare enrollment status, and which payers you need to be in-network with. We will show you what facility enrollment, payer credentialing, and medical staff work is actually open -- and what a clean, audit-ready credentialing cycle looks like for your facility.
Prefer to talk? Book a 15-minute callRequest received
A billing specialist will review your practice details and reach out within 1 business day. No confirmation email is sent — if you need to reach us sooner, call +1-872-297-2815.
Our Hospital & Facility Credentialing Services Methodology
Two-Track Scoping
We separate the facility's institutional enrollment from its medical staff credentialing at the outset, because they are distinct services with distinct owners -- revenue cycle owns the 855A and payer enrollment, while the medical staff office owns credentialing and privileging. Naming the tracks up front prevents the gaps that appear when a facility assumes one vendor covered both.
Right-Form Enrollment
We file the correct CMS application for the entity through PECOS -- the 855A for the institutional provider, and the 855B or 855I only where group or individual enrollment is genuinely in scope -- and pay the institutional application fee with the filing. Matching form to entity is the difference between a clean submission and a rejected one.
Bylaws-Anchored Privileging
Every privileging decision maps to the criteria in the medical staff bylaws and the procedure for applying them (42 CFR 482.22(c)(6)). Because the governing body may appoint medical staff only after considering the medical staff's recommendations (42 CFR 482.12(a)(2)), we keep the file traceable from verified credentials to recommendation to appointment.
Recurring-Cycle Monitoring
Credentialing and enrollment are ongoing queues, not one-time events. The medical staff must periodically appraise its members (42 CFR 482.22(a)(1)) and CMS enrollment must be revalidated, so we monitor expirables and deadlines and drive reappointment and revalidation before anything lapses.
Audit-Ready Delegated Files
For delegated arrangements, we build files that survive the health plan's audit. Because the plan retains accountability even when it delegates, we document primary source verification and decision-making to the delegation agreement and keep delegation within NCQA's limits.
Hospital & Facility Credentialing Services: MedPrecision vs Alternatives
| Feature | MedPrecision | In-House | Other Providers |
|---|---|---|---|
| Facility Medicare Enrollment | CMS-855A filed and revalidated through PECOS, with the institutional application fee tracked and paid on time | 855A filed once, revalidation deadlines missed until billing privileges are deactivated | Payer credentialing only, facility Medicare enrollment left to the client |
| Entity / Form Matching | The right CMS-855 for each entity (855A, 855B, 855I) matched at intake | Wrong form filed, applications rejected and refiled | Individual-provider focus, institutional 855A not routinely handled |
| Medical Staff Privileging | Privileges mapped to the bylaws criteria and documented for the governing body (42 CFR 482.22(c)(6)) | Privileging tracked in spreadsheets with gaps discovered at reappraisal | Enrollment only, with no medical staff office support |
| Reappointment & Expirables | Periodic reappraisal cycles and expirables driven proactively (42 CFR 482.22(a)(1)) | Reappointments batched late, licenses and DEA lapsing between cycles | Limited monitoring between initial approval and renewal |
| Delegated Credentialing | CVO-style workflow built to the plan's delegation agreement and NCQA standards | Delegation audits fail on undocumented PSV or decision-making | No delegated-credentialing capability |
How the Transition Works
How we deliver hospital & facility credentialing services for your practice.
Facility & Scope Discovery
We start by identifying the entity type and what actually needs credentialing: the facility's current Medicare enrollment status, which payers it must be in-network with, and whether we are also supporting the medical staff office's practitioner credentialing or only facility and payer enrollment. These are distinct workstreams with distinct owners, so we scope them explicitly up front.
Enrollment & Application Filing
We assemble and file the correct CMS application -- the 855A for the institutional provider, plus 855B or 855I where group or individual enrollment is also in scope -- through PECOS, pay and document the institutional application fee, and submit the payer credentialing packets that get the facility in-network.
Primary Source Verification & Privileging
For medical staff work, we run primary source verification, compile the credentialing file, and map each practitioner's requested privileges to the bylaws criteria so the medical staff can make its recommendation and the governing body can act on it under 42 CFR 482.22 and 482.12.
Revalidation, Reappraisal & Monitoring
We track expirables and revalidation dates and drive the recurring reappointment and reappraisal cycles the Conditions of Participation require, so licenses, board status, enrollment, and privileges are renewed on schedule rather than discovered lapsed after a claim or a privileging decision has already gone out.
What Reporting and Visibility Looks Like
Transparency is built into every engagement. You will always know where your revenue stands and what actions are being taken on your behalf.
Monthly KPI Dashboards
Track collection rates, denial trends, days in A/R, and payer-level performance with dashboards delivered on a fixed schedule.
Real-Time Claim Tracking
See claim status updates in real time so you never have to wonder where a payment stands or when follow-up is happening.
Quarterly Business Reviews
Detailed reviews with actionable recommendations covering denial root causes, payer trends, and revenue recovery opportunities.
Proactive Alerts
Automated alerts when key metrics shift, so issues are caught and addressed before they affect your bottom line.
Hospital & Facility Credentialing Services Key Terms
- Institutional Provider
- As defined at 42 CFR 424.502, any provider or supplier that submits a CMS-855A, CMS-855B (excluding physician and non-physician practitioner organizations), or CMS-855S -- which is why an ambulatory surgical center is an institutional provider for fee purposes even though it files the CMS-855B rather than the 855A. Institutional providers must pay the Medicare application fee; individual physicians and non-physician practitioners filing a CMS-855I are exempt.
- CMS-855A
- The Medicare Enrollment Application for Institutional Providers (OMB control number 0938-0685), used by hospitals, critical access hospitals, SNFs, home health agencies, hospices and the other provider types CMS lists on it to enroll in and furnish Medicare Part A services. Ambulatory surgical centers are not on that list -- they enroll on the CMS-855B. It is filed and maintained through PECOS and covers initial enrollment, revalidation, changes, and voluntary termination.
- Clinical Privileges (Privileging)
- The specific procedures and services a practitioner is authorized to perform at a facility. Medical staff bylaws must include the criteria for determining the privileges granted to individual practitioners and a procedure for applying those criteria to each applicant (42 CFR 482.22(c)(6)).
- Delegated Credentialing
- An arrangement in which a health plan authorizes a delegate -- such as a hospital, health system, or facility -- to perform credentialing on its behalf. The plan retains responsibility and accountability; an NCQA article notes credentialing is among the most commonly delegated functions.
- Deemed Status
- A facility's demonstration of compliance with the Medicare Conditions of Participation through accreditation by a CMS-approved accrediting organization -- for hospitals, such as The Joint Commission or DNV Healthcare -- instead of a state survey, under Section 1865(a) of the Social Security Act.
Common Questions
Common questions about hospital & facility credentialing services.
Get a Free Billing Audit
See where denials, follow-up delays, or workflow gaps may be hurting your collections.
Get a Free Billing AuditWhat is the difference between hospital credentialing and individual provider credentialing?
They operate at different levels and often serve different buyers. Individual provider credentialing enrolls a single physician or non-physician practitioner (a CMS-855I with Medicare, plus commercial payer applications). Hospital credentialing services work at the facility level and add a second track: the facility itself must enroll in Medicare on its own application -- a CMS-855A for a hospital, a CMS-855B for an ASC -- and its medical staff must be credentialed and privileged under the hospital Conditions of Participation, where an organized medical staff operating under governing-body-approved bylaws is responsible for the quality of care (42 CFR 482.22). The facility enrollment side is typically owned by revenue cycle, while the credentialing and privileging side is run by the medical staff office -- so a facility engagement usually has to coordinate both.
Do you handle the facility's Medicare enrollment (CMS-855A) or only payer credentialing?
Both can be in scope, and we confirm which tracks you need at intake because they are distinct services. Facility Medicare enrollment means filing the application CMS assigns to the entity -- the CMS-855A, the Medicare Enrollment Application for Institutional Providers, for a hospital, or the CMS-855B for an ambulatory surgical center -- through PECOS, paying the institutional application fee, and then keeping the enrollment current with revalidations, changes of information, and new-location filings so Part A billing privileges do not lapse. Payer credentialing is the separate work of getting the facility in-network with commercial, Medicaid/CHIP, and Medicare Advantage plans. Some facilities want the full institutional enrollment plus payer credentialing; others already handle Medicare in-house and want only the payer side. We scope to what you actually need rather than assuming.
How much is the Medicare application fee for a facility in 2026?
For calendar year 2026 the Medicare enrollment application fee for institutional providers is $750, up from $730 in 2025. Per the Federal Register notice CMS-6096-N (90 FR 55738, 3 December 2025 — govinfo.gov, read 2 October 2026), that fee is required with any initial enrollment, revalidation, or new-practice-location application an institutional provider submits between January 1 and December 31, 2026. Individual physicians and non-physician practitioners filing a CMS-855I are exempt from the fee; the obligation attaches to institutional providers as defined at 42 CFR 424.502. We pay and document the fee as part of each qualifying filing so an application is not held up or returned for a missing fee.
How does credentialing by proxy work for telemedicine?
The hospital Conditions of Participation allow a form of credentialing by proxy for telemedicine. Under 42 CFR 482.22(a)(3), a hospital's governing body may rely on the credentialing and privileging decisions made by a distant-site hospital for a physician or practitioner providing telemedicine services -- but only if that distant-site hospital is Medicare-participating and the required written-agreement provisions are met. Done correctly, this lets the originating hospital extend telemedicine privileges without independently re-verifying every distant-site practitioner. We help set up and document those written agreements so the arrangement holds up under the CoP requirements rather than defaulting to full duplicate credentialing.
What does delegated credentialing require, and can you run it?
In delegated credentialing, a health plan authorizes a delegate -- such as a hospital, health system, or facility -- to perform credentialing on its behalf, but the plan retains responsibility and accountability to ensure the delegate meets expectations; an NCQA article notes credentialing is among the most commonly delegated functions. There are limits: as of July 2024, NCQA lets an organization delegate more than 50% of primary source verification only to NCQA-Accredited or NCQA-Certified delegates, and an organization is not eligible for NCQA Credentialing Accreditation if it delegates more than 50% of credentialing decision-making. When a delegated arrangement is in scope, we build and run the CVO-style workflow -- application intake, primary source verification, file assembly, and decision documentation -- to the plan's delegation agreement so it survives the plan's audit.
How does accreditation (deemed status) affect facility credentialing?
Under Section 1865(a) of the Social Security Act, a facility may demonstrate compliance with the Medicare Conditions of Participation through accreditation by a CMS-approved accrediting organization instead of a state survey -- known as 'deemed status.' For hospitals, CMS-approved accreditors include The Joint Commission and DNV Healthcare, and their standards must meet or exceed Medicare's. That matters for credentialing because the accreditor examines the medical staff's credentialing and privileging directly: bylaws must carry the criteria for privileges and a procedure for applying them (42 CFR 482.22(c)(6)), and bylaws must also require a completed history and physical within 30 days before or 24 hours after admission or registration, prior to surgery or a procedure requiring anesthesia. We align the credentialing files, privileging records, and bylaws criteria to what those surveys look for.
How long does hospital and facility credentialing take?
Expect it to run several months, because 'facility credentialing' is several clocks running at once and the total is set by the slowest of them. Payer credentialing with commercial plans runs on each plan's committee cycle; Medicare institutional enrollment on the CMS-855A runs on the Medicare Administrative Contractor's queue; and medical staff privileging is gated by how often the governing body meets, since under the hospital Conditions of Participation it appoints practitioners only after considering the medical staff's recommendations (42 CFR 482.12(a)(2)). Complete, fully verified applications move the timeline most.
What is credentialing by proxy for telehealth and facility privileging?
Credentialing by proxy is a shortcut the Medicare Conditions of Participation allow so a hospital need not re-credential every remote clinician who treats its patients by telehealth. CMS created it in a final rule published May 5, 2011. It uses two written-agreement pathways: under 42 CFR 482.22(a)(3) the governing body may rely on the credentialing and privileging decisions of a Medicare-participating distant-site hospital, and under 482.22(a)(4) it may rely on a distant-site telemedicine entity whose credentialing standards at least meet the CoP requirements. Either way, the clinician must be licensed in the patient's state and appear on a current privilege list from the distant site. We draft and document the written agreements behind either pathway.
Related Services
Specialties We Serve
Related Resources
Available In
Map Your Facility's Credentialing Gaps
Tell us your entity type, your current Medicare enrollment status, and which payers you need to be in-network with. We will show you what facility enrollment, payer credentialing, and medical staff work is actually open -- and what a clean, audit-ready credentialing cycle looks like for your facility.
- No contract
- No setup fees
- Reply within 1 business day