NCCI (National Correct Coding Initiative)

Definition

CMS implemented the NCCI program in 1996 to promote correct coding and control improper payment on Part B claims, and it publishes revised edit tables quarterly. PTP edits pair a Column One and a Column Two code: report both for the same beneficiary on the same date of service and the Column One code is eligible for payment while the Column Two code is denied, unless a clinically appropriate NCCI PTP-associated modifier is allowed and reported. Each pair carries a Correct Coding Modifier Indicator — 0 means no modifier can bypass the edit, 1 means an associated modifier may bypass it under appropriate circumstances, and 9 marks pairs whose deletion date equals their effective date. The associated modifiers are the anatomic set, the global-surgery modifiers 24, 25, 57, 58, 78 and 79, and 27, 59, 91, XE, XS, XP and XU; modifiers 22, 76 and 77 are not among them and do not bypass an edit. MUEs are the unit-of-service limit, and they do not all work per day — the MUE Adjudication Indicator decides. MAI 1 is a claim-line edit, so units above the value deny that line and appropriate modifiers can place the same code on separate lines, each adjudicated on its own. MAI 2 and MAI 3 are date-of-service edits that sum every line for that code and date: MAI 2 values are absolute policy limits a contractor may not override, while MAI 3 values are clinical benchmarks a contractor may bypass on medical-record evidence. Not every code has an MUE, and CMS publishes most values but keeps some confidential. Edits are published separately for practitioner claims, outpatient hospital claims and, for MUE, DME suppliers. State Medicaid programs run their own NCCI methodologies with their own files under section 6507 of the Affordable Care Act, and any other payer's edit set is its own business rather than a copy of Medicare's.

Common Misconceptions

An NCCI-associated modifier is not a bill-and-hope switch. The NCCI Policy Manual states that a modifier must not be appended to a code solely to bypass an edit when the clinical circumstances do not justify it, and that documentation in the medical record must satisfy the criteria required by whichever modifier is used. CMS's own modifier booklet describes 59 as a modifier that physicians and providers often use incorrectly — which is why the X modifiers (XE, XS, XP, XU) arrived in 2015: they make the coder name the reason rather than assert distinctness in general.

Related Terms