What Are Claims Submission Services?
Claims submission services prepare, scrub, and electronically transmit ANSI 837P (professional) and 837I (institutional) healthcare claims to payers via clearinghouse connections. The work covers pre-submission edits (NCCI, MUE, LCD/NCD), payer-specific rule validation, modifier and bundling checks, electronic transmission, rejection triage, and secondary/tertiary claim generation. Industry baseline first-pass acceptance is 89.3% per AMA data; the well-managed benchmark is 95%+, and MedPrecision portfolios average 97.8%.
- 97.8% first-pass acceptance across MedPrecision client portfolio
- Three-layer scrubbing: NCCI/MUE edits + payer-specific rules + manual review
- Same-day correction and resubmission of front-end rejections
- Automated secondary claim generation off primary 835 ERA
Claims Submission Services
Clean claims get paid faster. MedPrecision's claims submission services combine rigorous pre-submission scrubbing with electronic delivery to achieve first-pass acceptance rates above 97%.
The AMA's 2024 National Health Insurer Report Card found average first-pass claim acceptance across commercial payers sits at 89.3% — meaning more than 1 in 10 submitted claims requires rework before payment. MGMA pegs the rework cost per rejected claim at $25 to $50, and HFMA's 2024 Claims Management survey shows practices below a 90% clean-claim rate spend roughly 3.1% of net revenue on rework alone. CMS processes about 1.2 billion Medicare fee-for-service claims annually with an initial denial rate near 17% per KFF analysis, which is why pre-submission validation is the cheapest dollar in revenue cycle. MedPrecision's claims submission services run every claim through three layers before transmission: automated NCCI, LCD/NCD, and MUE edits; payer-specific rule validation against a continuously maintained library updated within 48 hours of any payer policy change; and manual review of flagged claims by certified billing specialists. Claims are submitted electronically via the optimal clearinghouse per payer (Availity, Change Healthcare, Trizetto, Waystar, Office Ally), with same-day rejection correction, automated secondary submission, and timely-filing tracking that prevents claims from aging into the 90-365 day payer windows unworked.
Who This Service Is For
The State of Claims Submission Services in 2026
The AMA's 2024 National Health Insurer Report Card found that the average first-pass claim acceptance rate across commercial payers is 89.3%, meaning over 10% of claims require rework before payment. MGMA data shows that each rejected claim costs a practice between $25 and $50 in administrative rework expenses, and practices with clean claim rates below 90% spend an estimated 3.1% of net revenue on claim rework alone. HFMA's 2024 Claims Management survey found that practices using multi-layer scrubbing achieve first-pass rates above 96%, compared to 87% for practices relying solely on clearinghouse edits. CMS processes approximately 1.2 billion Medicare fee-for-service claims annually, with an initial denial rate of approximately 17% according to KFF analysis, underscoring the importance of pre-submission validation. The transition to electronic claim submission has reduced processing time from 30-45 days for paper claims to 14-21 days for electronic submissions, but the financial impact of rejections remains significant. According to the CAQH Index, the healthcare industry could save $9.4 billion annually by increasing electronic claims submission and reducing manual intervention in the claims process.
What Is Breaking Right Now
Low first-pass claim acceptance rates causing delays and rework costs
Recurring claim rejections from the same payer-specific issues
Claims lost to timely filing deadlines due to poor tracking
Revenue delays from slow or manual claim submission processes
Common Claims Submission Services Mistakes to Avoid
Relying solely on clearinghouse edits for claim validation
Clearinghouse edits catch only basic formatting errors and standard code edits. They do not validate against payer-specific rules, contract provisions, or LCD/NCD policies, allowing a significant percentage of claims to pass through and be denied at the payer level.
Layer payer-specific edit rules on top of clearinghouse validation, including medical necessity checks, modifier requirements, and bundling rules unique to each payer.
Not tracking rejection patterns by payer and reason code
Without systematic tracking, the same rejection reasons recur indefinitely. Staff spends time fixing the same types of errors repeatedly rather than implementing preventive measures.
Maintain a rejection analytics dashboard that tracks rejection rates by payer, reason code, CPT code, and provider. Review weekly and implement corrective actions for any rejection category exceeding 1% of submissions.
Delaying secondary claim submission after primary adjudication
Secondary claims that are not submitted promptly after primary payment risk timely filing denials from the secondary payer. Many practices lose 5-10% of secondary payer revenue to this delay.
Automate secondary claim generation triggered by primary payment posting, with submission within 24 hours of primary EOB receipt.
Submitting claims without verifying prior authorization status
Claims for services requiring prior authorization that are submitted without a valid auth number are denied immediately. The appeal process is lengthy and success rates for retroactive authorization are low.
Build authorization verification into the pre-submission scrubbing process. Any claim for a service type that typically requires authorization is held until auth status is confirmed.
Using a single clearinghouse for all payers without performance analysis
Clearinghouse acceptance rates and processing speeds vary significantly by payer. Using a single clearinghouse can result in slower processing and higher rejection rates for certain payers.
Analyze clearinghouse performance data by payer quarterly and route claims through the optimal clearinghouse connection for each payer.
What We Handle
Multi-Layer Claim Scrubbing
Claims pass through automated edits, payer-specific rule checks, and manual review to catch errors that automated systems miss.
Electronic Claim Submission
ANSI 837 compliant electronic claims submitted to all major payers and clearinghouses with real-time acknowledgment tracking.
Rejection Management
Front-end rejections are corrected and resubmitted within 24 hours with root cause tracking to prevent recurring issues.
Timely Filing Monitoring
Automated tracking of payer-specific filing deadlines ensures no claim is lost to timely filing limits.
Multi-Payer Expertise
Submission rules for Medicare, Medicaid, Blue Cross, Aetna, Cigna, United, and hundreds of regional payers managed by our team.
Our Claims Submission Services Methodology
Payer Edit Rule Library Maintenance
We maintain a continuously updated library of submission rules for every payer your practice bills, including modifier requirements, bundling restrictions, medical necessity criteria, and documentation attachment rules. This library is the foundation of our scrubbing process and is updated within 48 hours of any payer policy change.
Multi-Layer Pre-Submission Scrubbing
Every claim passes through three validation layers before transmission: automated edit checks against NCCI, LCD/NCD, and MUE limits; payer-specific rule validation against our proprietary edit library; and manual review of flagged claims by experienced billing specialists. This layered approach catches errors that single-layer systems miss.
Clearinghouse Optimization
We analyze acceptance rates and processing speeds across multiple clearinghouses for each payer and route claims through the channel with the highest acceptance rate and fastest adjudication. Some payers process claims 5-10 days faster through specific clearinghouse connections, and we leverage those advantages.
Real-Time Rejection Triage
Rejections are captured in real time as clearinghouse acknowledgments are received. Each rejection is categorized by root cause, assigned to the appropriate resolution workflow, and corrected within the same business day. This prevents rejections from aging into timely filing risks.
Submission Analytics and Trend Monitoring
Weekly analysis of rejection rates by payer, rejection reason, CPT code, and provider identifies emerging patterns before they become systemic problems. A spike in rejections from a specific payer triggers an immediate rule library review and preemptive correction.
Secondary and Tertiary Claim Automation
After primary payer adjudication, secondary claims are automatically generated with the primary EOB data attached and submitted without manual intervention. This eliminates the common delay where secondary claims sit waiting for someone to process them manually.
Real Results
The Challenge
First-pass claim acceptance rate had dropped to 88% after a payer changed its modifier requirements for dermatologic procedures. The practice was resubmitting over 400 claims per month, creating a backlog that delayed payments by an average of 35 additional days.
Our Approach
MedPrecision conducted a payer-by-payer rejection analysis, identifying that 72% of rejections came from three payers with updated modifier and bundling rules. We reconfigured claim scrubbing rules for each payer, retrained the coding team on new modifier requirements, and implemented a pre-submission edit check specific to dermatology procedure bundles.
Key Outcomes
- check_circle First-pass acceptance rate improved from 88% to 98.2% within 45 days
- check_circle Monthly claim resubmissions dropped from 400+ to fewer than 50
- check_circle Average payment cycle shortened by 28 days
- check_circle Annual rework costs reduced by approximately $86,000
“The rejection volume was overwhelming our small billing team. MedPrecision not only fixed the immediate problem but built payer-specific rules so the same rejections could never happen again.”
Claims Submission Services: MedPrecision vs Alternatives
| Feature | MedPrecision | In-House | Other Providers |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-Submission Scrubbing | Three-layer validation: automated edits, payer-specific rules, and manual review | Basic clearinghouse edits only, no payer-specific validation | Automated scrubbing with limited payer-specific customization |
| Payer Rule Updates | Updated within 48 hours of any payer policy change | Updated reactively after rejections are received | Quarterly or semi-annual rule updates |
| Rejection Resolution Time | Same-day correction and resubmission for all front-end rejections | 3-7 day turnaround depending on staff workload | 24-48 hour standard turnaround |
| Clearinghouse Management | Optimal routing per payer based on acceptance rate and speed data | Single clearinghouse for all payers regardless of performance | Limited clearinghouse options with standard routing |
| Secondary Claim Processing | Automated generation and submission after primary adjudication | Manual process often delayed by weeks | Semi-automated with manual review required |
| Timely Filing Protection | Automated deadline tracking with escalation alerts at 30 days before expiration | Manual tracking with frequent missed deadlines | Basic deadline alerts without proactive management |
“A 97% clean claim rate sounds impressive until you realize that the remaining 3% represents thousands of dollars in rework costs and delayed payments every month. The goal is high acceptance rates but zero preventable rejections. Every rejection should trigger a rule update that prevents it from ever happening again.”
MedPrecision Billing Team
Director of Claims Operations
How the Transition Works
How we deliver claims submission services for your practice.
Claim Receipt & Initial Validation
Charges are received from coding, validated for completeness (demographics, insurance, codes, modifiers), and flagged if any required elements are missing.
Payer-Specific Scrubbing
Each claim is scrubbed against the specific payer's submission rules, including medical necessity checks, prior auth verification, and coding edit compliance.
Electronic Submission & Tracking
Clean claims are transmitted electronically via appropriate clearinghouses with real-time tracking of acceptance, rejection, and pending statuses.
Rejection Resolution & Feedback Loop
Rejected claims are corrected and resubmitted within 24 hours. Rejection patterns are analyzed and fed back to coding and registration teams to prevent recurrence.
What Reporting and Visibility Looks Like
Transparency is built into every engagement. You will always know where your revenue stands and what actions are being taken on your behalf.
Monthly KPI Dashboards
Track collection rates, denial trends, days in A/R, and payer-level performance with dashboards delivered on a fixed schedule.
Real-Time Claim Tracking
See claim status updates in real time so you never have to wonder where a payment stands or when follow-up is happening.
Quarterly Business Reviews
Detailed reviews with actionable recommendations covering denial root causes, payer trends, and revenue recovery opportunities.
Proactive Alerts
Automated alerts when key metrics shift, so issues are caught and addressed before they affect your bottom line.
Claims Submission Services Key Terms
- Clean Claim
- A claim that is accepted by the payer on first submission without requiring correction, resubmission, or additional information. A clean claim contains all required data elements, correct coding, and passes all payer-specific edits.
- ANSI 837
- The standard electronic format for submitting healthcare claims to payers, as mandated by HIPAA. The 837P is used for professional claims and the 837I for institutional claims.
- Clearinghouse
- An intermediary organization that receives electronic claims from providers, validates formatting, and routes them to the appropriate payers. Major clearinghouses include Availity, Change Healthcare, and Waystar.
- Front-End Rejection
- A claim that is rejected by the clearinghouse or payer before entering the adjudication process due to formatting errors, missing data, or basic edit failures. Unlike denials, rejections are not adjudicated decisions and do not count against timely filing.
- MUE Limit
- Medically Unlikely Edit. CMS-established maximum number of units of service that would be expected for a single CPT code on a single date of service for a single patient. Claims exceeding MUE limits are automatically denied.
- ERA (Electronic Remittance Advice)
- The electronic equivalent of an Explanation of Benefits, transmitted in ANSI 835 format. Contains detailed payment, adjustment, and denial information for each claim line, enabling automated payment posting.
- Coordination of Benefits
- The process of determining which insurance plan pays first (primary) and which pays second (secondary) when a patient has multiple insurance coverages. Incorrect COB information is a primary driver of claim rejections.
Common Questions
Common questions about claims submission services.
Get a Free Billing Audit
See where denials, follow-up delays, or workflow gaps may be hurting your collections.
Get a Free Billing Audit arrow_forwardWhat is a clean claim rate and why does it matter?
Clean claim rate is the percentage of claims accepted by payers on first submission without correction, resubmission, or additional information requests, measured against the ANSI 837 transaction set. The AMA's 2024 National Health Insurer Report Card places the average commercial first-pass acceptance at 89.3%, and HFMA benchmarks the well-managed practice target at 95% or higher. MedPrecision client portfolios run 97-99%, with a portfolio-weighted average of 97.8%. Every percentage point matters financially: MGMA estimates each rejected claim costs $25-$50 in rework, and HFMA finds practices below 90% clean-claim rates spend approximately 3.1% of net revenue on rejection handling alone. Beyond rework cost, rejected claims delay payment by 14-35 days on the resubmission cycle and increase the risk of timely-filing denials (CARC 29) when the original rejection ages without correction. The economic case for moving from 90% to 97% on a $5M practice is roughly $150,000 in recovered net revenue annually.
How quickly are claims submitted after charges are entered?
Claims are scrubbed and submitted the same business day charges are received. For charges entered before the 3 PM cutoff, claims are typically transmitted to clearinghouses by end of business the same day; charges received after 3 PM go out the following morning. Same-day submission matters for two reasons. First, it removes one to five days from the days-in-A/R calculation versus the typical 1-5 day in-house lag, which directly improves cash flow on a rolling basis. Second, it preserves the full 90-365 day timely-filing window that commercial payers allow (Medicare's 12-month window is more generous, but commercial windows are tighter). Each claim moves through four stages within the same-day window: receipt and completeness validation (demographics, insurance, CPT, modifiers, ICD-10), payer-specific scrubbing against the maintained edit library, electronic transmission via the optimal clearinghouse, and clearinghouse acknowledgment capture for any front-end rejections. Rejections that come back within minutes of submission are corrected and resubmitted the same day.
Which clearinghouses do you work with?
MedPrecision submits through all major clearinghouses: Availity, Change Healthcare, Trizetto (Cognizant), Office Ally, Waystar, and direct payer portals where direct submission outperforms clearinghouse routing. The clearinghouse selection per payer is data-driven rather than fixed: acceptance rates, average adjudication time, and rejection-reason granularity vary by payer-clearinghouse pairing, and routing through the wrong combination can add 5-10 days to the payment cycle on certain payers. CAQH Index data shows the healthcare industry could save $9.4 billion annually by routing claims through optimal electronic channels and reducing manual intervention, which is why claim routing is reviewed quarterly per payer rather than configured once and left alone. All clearinghouse relationships, enrollment paperwork, EFT/ERA setup, and credential maintenance are handled by MedPrecision; the practice does not manage individual clearinghouse contracts. Electronic submission rate runs 99.6% across the client portfolio, with the residual paper claims limited to specific Medicaid plans and workers' comp carriers that still require paper UB-04 or CMS-1500 submission.
How do you handle secondary and tertiary claim submissions?
Secondary and tertiary claims are generated automatically the moment the primary payer's 835 ERA is posted, with the primary EOB data attached in the required ANSI 837 COB segments. This automation matters because secondary claims that wait for manual processing routinely lose 5-10% of secondary payer revenue to timely-filing denials — many secondary payers run 90-day filing windows from the primary remit date, not the original date of service, and manual workflows commonly miss that distinction. The automated workflow tracks coordination of benefits (COB) across all coverage layers to confirm the full benefit hierarchy is used: Medicare primary with commercial secondary, commercial primary with Medicaid secondary, dual commercial coverage, Medicare Advantage with supplemental, and tricare scenarios are all handled per CMS coordination of benefits rules. COB errors are caught at the eligibility verification stage rather than at claim submission, which prevents the rejection cycle entirely. For practices switching to MedPrecision with backlogged unprocessed secondaries, the cleanup typically runs in the first 30 days of engagement and recovers 3-5% of net revenue that was previously walking out the door.
Related Services
Specialties We Serve
Related Resources
Available In
Get a Free Billing Audit
Find out how many of your claims are being rejected before they even reach the payer. Our audit will show you exactly where your submission process is breaking.